Compare countries

Two or three countries, side by side, one row per question. Pick up to 3.

Countries

ArmeniaChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: MediumEnforcement: Dormant

In one paragraph: Armenia lets personal data leave, but only to a country on an official approved list of 53 states, or with case-by-case permission from the privacy regulator. That regulator has had no boss since February 2026 and the largest fine it can impose is about 1,300 US dollars. The real constraints are elsewhere: government data sent to a foreign cloud must keep a backup copy inside Armenia, and banking and medical secrecy sit outside the privacy law entirely.
The catch: The approved-country list is worthless in three places. Government bodies must keep an in-country backup of anything they put in a cloud abroad. Bank, notarial, lawyer and insurance secrets are carved out of the privacy law and are governed by their own secrecy statutes, which list exhaustively who may see the data and do not mention foreign cloud providers. And leaking medical secrets is a crime that can put a named individual in prison, not just a fine on the company.
Does this apply to me?: Probably not, if you have nothing in Armenia. The privacy law describes who it covers by naming Armenian public bodies, companies and individuals who process personal data. It contains no clause saying it follows Armenians' data abroad, and no rule requiring a foreign company to appoint someone inside Armenia. There is no size or revenue threshold either, so a one-person Armenian business is caught exactly like a bank.Medium confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Armenia runs an approved-country list: if the destination is on it, you can send data with no permission from anyone. The list is real and populated — 53 countries, including all of the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Georgia and Russia. Sending data anywhere else needs written permission from the privacy regulator first, and that regulator currently has nobody in the chair. Three sectors override this entirely: government, banking-type secrets, and health.High confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: The model is an approved list, and the list is full. Fifty-three countries were approved on 8 July 2024 and that decision has never been changed. If your destination is on it you need nothing — no standard contract, no filing, no fee. If it is not on it, you must write to the regulator before you send anything, attach the contract you plan to sign, and wait up to 30 days for a yes or a no.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: On paper, the Personal Data Protection Agency inside the Ministry of Justice. In practice, nobody right now: its head resigned with effect from 24 February 2026 and no replacement appointment has been published. In more than eleven years the agency has published exactly one general decision — the approved-country list. Two other regulators are genuinely working: the Central Bank supervises banks, payment firms, insurers and securities, and a brand-new Information Systems Regulatory Commission was appointed in March and April 2026 to police cybersecurity and state computer systems.Medium confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: The floor is five years for anything that proves your tax position. The ceiling is not a number — it is a principle: you must destroy or block personal data as soon as you no longer need it for the purpose you collected it for. Two hard clocks sit inside that principle. If someone withdraws consent you have ten working days to destroy their data, then three more working days to tell them you did. If you spot unlawful processing you have three working days to fix it or destroy the data.High confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count three clocks. Under the privacy law, if data leaks out of your electronic systems you must immediately publish a public announcement about it and at the same time tell the Armenian police and the privacy regulator — there is no grace period and no threshold. If you run a system in a sector the state calls vital, you have 24 hours to tell the cybersecurity regulator, 72 hours to send an update, two days to warn the people affected, and one month to file a final report. Both sets of duties can bite at once.High confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that will ruin your week. One: a data leak must be announced publicly and reported to the police, not just to the regulator. Two: encryption is legally compulsory, not a best practice, and failing to use it is its own separate fine. Three: before you process biometric or sensitive data you must notify the regulator in advance and wait to be entered in its register. Four: to process a dead person's data you need the consent of all of their legal heirs. Five: a child is anyone under 16 here, not 13 and not 18.High confidence
What's about to change?: Armenia rewired its digital rulebook in December 2025 and the deadlines land through 2026, 2027 and 2028. Rules for cyber incidents and for state computer systems are already live. Detailed technical rules are due by January 2027, internal cybersecurity policies and risk assessments by July 2027, and security certificates for critical systems by January 2028. The change most likely to catch someone out is not a new law at all: the approved-country list can be rewritten by one official's signature.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: Government — «Ամպայինն առաջինը» քաղաքականության մշակման և ներդրման մասին ՀՀ կառավարության որոշում

PolandChecked 18 August 2026

Yes, with paperworkWork: HighEnforcement: Active

In one paragraph: Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch: True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?: Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?: Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?: Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?: The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?: There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?: Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?: Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?: Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall: None found.

The eight framework questions answered for each selected country
Question	ArmeniaChecked 18 August 2026	PolandChecked 18 August 2026
The three ratings	Yes, with paperwork Work: Medium Enforcement: Dormant	Yes, with paperwork Work: High Enforcement: Active
In one paragraph	Armenia lets personal data leave, but only to a country on an official approved list of 53 states, or with case-by-case permission from the privacy regulator. That regulator has had no boss since February 2026 and the largest fine it can impose is about 1,300 US dollars. The real constraints are elsewhere: government data sent to a foreign cloud must keep a backup copy inside Armenia, and banking and medical secrecy sit outside the privacy law entirely.	Poland is a European Union country, so data may leave as long as you use one of the approved European transfer routes. We found no general Polish rule forcing data to stay in the country. The privacy regulator is fully staffed and busy, and it fines government bodies as well as companies. Finance is the sector to watch: the financial supervisor wants cloud data kept in Europe.
The catch	The approved-country list is worthless in three places. Government bodies must keep an in-country backup of anything they put in a cloud abroad. Bank, notarial, lawyer and insurance secrets are carved out of the privacy law and are governed by their own secrecy statutes, which list exhaustively who may see the data and do not mention foreign cloud providers. And leaking medical secrets is a crime that can put a named individual in prison, not just a fine on the company.	True in general, much weaker in finance. Banks, insurers, brokers and payment firms follow a supervisory notice telling them to keep cloud data in European data centres, to put critical firms' data inside Poland first where they can, and to warn the financial supervisor 14 days before any cloud project starts. That notice is a strong recommendation, not a ban — but the supervisor checks it. Classified government information sits outside all of this and is effectively locked inside Poland.
Does this apply to me?	Probably not, if you have nothing in Armenia. The privacy law describes who it covers by naming Armenian public bodies, companies and individuals who process personal data. It contains no clause saying it follows Armenians' data abroad, and no rule requiring a foreign company to appoint someone inside Armenia. There is no size or revenue threshold either, so a one-person Armenian business is caught exactly like a bank.Medium confidence	Yes, it reaches you with no office in Poland. European privacy law applies to any organisation anywhere that offers goods or services to people in Poland, or that monitors their behaviour. There is no size or revenue threshold. An organisation based outside Europe normally has to name a representative inside Europe. Poland then adds one local step that foreign groups routinely miss: if you must appoint a data protection officer, you have to tell the Polish regulator that person's name and contact details within 14 days of appointing them.High confidence
Can the data leave the country?	Yes, with paperwork. Armenia runs an approved-country list: if the destination is on it, you can send data with no permission from anyone. The list is real and populated — 53 countries, including all of the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Georgia and Russia. Sending data anywhere else needs written permission from the privacy regulator first, and that regulator currently has nobody in the chair. Three sectors override this entirely: government, banking-type secrets, and health.High confidence	Yes, with paperwork. Poland has not added a general rule of its own that keeps data inside the country, and European law actually forbids member states from imposing storage-location rules on data that is not about people, except on public-security grounds. We searched for industry walls in banking, payments, insurance, securities, health, telecoms, government cloud, mapping and gambling. The only one we could confirm from an official Polish source is in finance, and it is a firm supervisory recommendation rather than an outright ban.Medium confidence
What do I have to do to send it abroad?	The model is an approved list, and the list is full. Fifty-three countries were approved on 8 July 2024 and that decision has never been changed. If your destination is on it you need nothing — no standard contract, no filing, no fee. If it is not on it, you must write to the regulator before you send anything, attach the contract you plan to sign, and wait up to 30 days for a yes or a no.High confidence	Think of it as an approved-routes list. Personal data may go outside Europe if the destination country has been officially approved, or if you sign the standard European contract with the recipient, or if your corporate group has rules approved by a regulator. The approved-country list is real and populated — roughly sixteen countries plus one international organisation. For the United States it only covers companies that have signed up to a specific certification scheme, so you have to check the recipient, not the country.High confidence
Who enforces this — and are they actually working?	On paper, the Personal Data Protection Agency inside the Ministry of Justice. In practice, nobody right now: its head resigned with effect from 24 February 2026 and no replacement appointment has been published. In more than eleven years the agency has published exactly one general decision — the approved-country list. Two other regulators are genuinely working: the Central Bank supervises banks, payment firms, insurers and securities, and a brand-new Information Systems Regulatory Commission was appointed in March and April 2026 to police cybersecurity and state computer systems.Medium confidence	The Personal Data Protection Office, and it is genuinely working. It is led by Mirosław Wróblewski, it publishes news several times a week, and its public decisions database held 581 decisions when we checked on 18 August 2026, with new ones published through June and July 2026. It fines public bodies too: it penalised the Minister of Justice in June 2026 and a local social welfare centre later the same month. Three other regulators matter — the financial supervisor for banks and insurers, the electronic communications office for telecoms and post, and the Ministry of Digital Affairs for cyber security.High confidence
How long must I keep it, and when must I delete it?	The floor is five years for anything that proves your tax position. The ceiling is not a number — it is a principle: you must destroy or block personal data as soon as you no longer need it for the purpose you collected it for. Two hard clocks sit inside that principle. If someone withdraws consent you have ten working days to destroy their data, then three more working days to tell them you did. If you spot unlawful processing you have three working days to fix it or destroy the data.High confidence	There is a ceiling and a floor. The ceiling is European: you may not keep personal data in a form that identifies someone for longer than you need it, and you have to be able to state that period. The floor is Polish: tax, accounting, employment and medical rules force you to keep certain records for years. When the two collide, the specific keeping duty wins for those records and everything else must still be deleted on time. We could not open the official Polish texts for the exact periods on the day we checked, so treat any specific number you read elsewhere as unverified until you see the statute.Medium confidence
What happens when something goes wrong?	Count three clocks. Under the privacy law, if data leaks out of your electronic systems you must immediately publish a public announcement about it and at the same time tell the Armenian police and the privacy regulator — there is no grace period and no threshold. If you run a system in a sector the state calls vital, you have 24 hours to tell the cybersecurity regulator, 72 hours to send an update, two days to warn the people affected, and one month to file a final report. Both sets of duties can bite at once.High confidence	Count at least two clocks, often three. For a personal data breach you have 72 hours to tell the Polish privacy regulator, and you must warn the people affected without undue delay if the risk to them is high. Separately, Poland rewrote its cyber security law and the new version started on 3 April 2026; if you are on the new register of key or important organisations you also report to the national cyber teams, on a much shorter first clock. Financial firms add a third set of reporting duties to the financial supervisor. The overlap is what breaks people, because the same incident triggers all three with different content and different deadlines.Medium confidence
What's the trap?	Five things that will ruin your week. One: a data leak must be announced publicly and reported to the police, not just to the regulator. Two: encryption is legally compulsory, not a best practice, and failing to use it is its own separate fine. Three: before you process biometric or sensitive data you must notify the regulator in advance and wait to be entered in its register. Four: to process a dead person's data you need the consent of all of their legal heirs. Five: a child is anyone under 16 here, not 13 and not 18.High confidence	Five things that are not in the summary. First, appointing a data protection officer is not the end of it — you have 14 days to file that person's name and contact details with the Polish regulator, and foreign groups miss this constantly. Second, the list of Polish organisations that must appoint one is wider than expected and includes the central bank and state research institutes. Third, a brand-new Polish law on data management started in July 2026 and can fine you about two million złoty, roughly $550,000, for sending protected public-sector data to the wrong country. Fourth, the financial supervisor expects to be told 14 days before a cloud project starts and wants critical firms' data inside Poland where possible. Fifth, being a public body is no shield — the regulator fined the Minister of Justice in June 2026.High confidence
What's about to change?	Armenia rewired its digital rulebook in December 2025 and the deadlines land through 2026, 2027 and 2028. Rules for cyber incidents and for state computer systems are already live. Detailed technical rules are due by January 2027, internal cybersecurity policies and risk assessments by July 2027, and security certificates for critical systems by January 2028. The change most likely to catch someone out is not a new law at all: the approved-country list can be rewritten by one official's signature.High confidence	Three dated things and one live risk. Poland's new cyber security register is being phased in through 2026: self-registration opened on 7 May 2026, and organisations the ministry enters itself get six months from being served notice to complete their details. On 12 January 2027 European rules ban cloud providers from charging you anything to move your data out. On 2 April 2027 a new European regulation on how privacy regulators run cross-border cases starts to apply, which will change how Polish complaints against foreign companies are handled. The live risk is the European Union–United States data transfer arrangement, which is valid today but being challenged.High confidence
Hardest industry wall	Government — «Ամպայինն առաջինը» քաղաքականության մշակման և ներդրման մասին ՀՀ կառավարության որոշում	None found.